Following his doctoral studies he joined Janssen Pharmaceutica.
In Part Iwe described surprising -- and apparently totally unrecognized, until now -- pivotal new details around the seminal events which quietly unfolded the night of January 31, -- when the United States finally carried out its first successful launch of an artificial Earth satellite, Explorer I.
How, Wernher von Braun -- "Operation Paperclip" chief German rocket engineer, and head of the US Army effort that actually launched Explorer I using the Jupiter-C rocket that von Braun and his German team had specifically designed -- was, at first, intensely disappointed By the totally unexpected orbital performance of "his" first US satellite.
For -- mysteriously -- Explorer I had reached an orbit of the Earth that night fully one third higher than the one green line - below originally planned! We also noted in Part I of this report the immediate -- and still continuing -- national security classification of these amazing scientific findings, which have both prevented open civilian research into the far-reaching implications of Explorer I's astonishing "anti-gravity" behavior for these past fifty years Yet, despite this "security lid," we were able to document von Braun's surprising, clandestine, years-long personal search -- following Explorer I -- for "answers" to these inexplicable celestial-mechanics questions But, even more remarkable Explorer I was not alone in this achievement!
Review of the publicly-available data revealed the equally-unexpected "over performance" of two additional Explorer satellites in von Braun's early Army program, as well as similar "mysteriously enlarged orbits" of all three successful US Navy Vanguard satellites And yet, as also noted in our first section -- even after fifty years -- no one seems to have noticed or asked any in-depth questions about this astonishing sequence of events: To say nothing of the simultaneous appearance of enormous quantities of literal "free energy" Regardless of the public secrecy and security classifications that high-level governmental policy makers immediately placed around this night, the question which MUST be asked now is: A technology which ultimately could control even-- Gravity itself?!
And if so, has this overwhelmingly important technical and political development also been officially kept secret, literally for decades There is, however, another school of thought vis a vis "what did von Braun and other Operation Paperclip Germans really know about Explorer I's 'non-Newtonian dynamics'.?
In this discussion, there was the definite possibility that von Braun after all, once a Major in Himmler's "SS" Which would have been, of course, directly relevant to Von Braun's own ability to instantly recognize the similar "non-Newtonian behavior" of Explorer I!
After looking at this really hard, I happen not to share this point of view If von Braun had been knowledgeable about prior " Nazi inertia and gravity-control experiments" ala "the Bell," why did he then personally go "in hot persuit" of an alternative physics theory to explain "the inexplicable" around Explorer I?
Why, as part of his major effort to understand the startling phenomenon that accompanied Explorer I's launch into orbit, did he subsequently write to all those "alternative physicists" around the world, seeking a new theoretical "non-Newtonian solution" to "the Problem? In fact, von Braun's well-documented, "inquisitive behavior" -- after the "shock" of Explorer I -- compellingly argues for a distinct lack of knowledge of the "Nazi Bell" on his part However, there is one other possibility That von Braun might have heard "just enough" about the Bell from "someone" that he trusted Whatever the facts around his "curious interest" in such physics and we may never know, for sure All of which formed an extremely solid foundation from which Enterprise could attempt to "back engineer" the ultimate process von Braun and JPL must have used in their years-long, documentable efforts to "figure out the Problem.
In graduate school, he pursued electrical engineering -- both at MIT and Harvard.Gyroscopic Stabilization of Unstable Vehicles Temitope Akinlua ([email protected]) Dmitriy Dryga ([email protected]) Adam Gunnett ([email protected]).
It is now the idea of gyroscopic stabilization to mix the modes of a system with indefinite damping such that the system is stabilized without introducing further dissipation.
This is done by adding gyroscopic forces \(G\dot x\) with a suitable skew-symmetric matrix \(G\) to the left-hand side. is Control Moment Gyroscopic (CMG) stabilization, which is the subject of this research.
This method has the advantage of being more easily controlled by onboard systems than active steering systems and will not interfere with the driver’s input steering angle.
In this master thesis the gyroscopic stabilization of a two-wheeled amphibious concept vehicle is investigated.
The inverted pendulum is a common, interesting control problem that involves many basic elements of control theory. This thesis investigates the standup routine and. Get this from a library! The gyroscopic stabilization of land vehicles,. [James Frederick Stanley Ross]. stabilization is dynamic stabilization, i.g. steering or shifting weight. The second method is Control Moment Gyroscopic (CMG) stabilization, which is the subject of this research.
The key idea is to neutralize external torques applied on the vehicle by the counter torque produced from the two gyroscopes attached on the vehicle.
Here the gyroscopes are used as. Analysis of Active Gyro Based Roll-Stabilization of Slender Boat Hulls Naval Architecture TAO ZHANG Master of Science Thesis Stockholm, Sweden 1 Analysis of Active Gyro Based Roll-Stabilization of Slender Boat Hulls Tao Zhang [email protected] perspective of using active gyro stabilization.
Feb 04, · A Control Moment Gyroscope (CMG) is used to balance or stabilize an unmanned autonomous bicycle. Thesis: iridis-photo-restoration.com Paper: ht.